King Charles III calls for Commonwealth to confront slave trade history and heal past
Story by: Regina Bless
King Charles III has called on Commonwealth member states to confront the painful legacy of the transatlantic slave trade and work towards healing historical injustices.
Speaking at the 28th Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Antigua and Barbuda, the monarch described the slave trade as a shameful chapter in human history, acknowledging its lasting impact on Caribbean nations and other Commonwealth countries.
Expressing personal sorrow over the suffering and abuses associated with the trade, King Charles said although history could not be changed, lessons could be drawn from the past to build a better future.
“History is not ours to choose or change. We cannot change the actions of those who came before us. We can, however, learn from the past,” he stated.
His remarks come amid growing calls from Caribbean governments and advocacy groups for reparations, accountability and formal recognition of the lasting consequences of slavery. However, the King stopped short of issuing a formal apology.
The King further emphasised the importance of improving access to education, creating employment opportunities, expanding trade among Commonwealth countries and strengthening climate resilience as practical ways of addressing inequalities and supporting disadvantaged communities.
His comments followed a position announced by UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who indicated Britain’s willingness to consider a formal state apology for its historical involvement in the transatlantic slave trade. Burnham also called for honest discussions about Britain’s past and proposed alternative support measures, including debt restructuring and more favourable repayment terms for poorer Commonwealth nations.
The issue of reparatory justice remained a major talking point at the summit, with Caribbean leaders and campaigners demanding meaningful recognition, accountability and concrete action to address the enduring economic and social consequences of slavery.
The discussions have renewed attention on Britain’s historical responsibility and the question of whether expressions of regret should be accompanied by a formal apology and practical measures to address the legacy of slavery.